Sunday, June 14th, 2009...11:19 am
Six blogging mistakes: Don’t make them on your blog
First, a personal note. Sorry, I haven’t been blogging for a while. I’ve been quite ill, with a suspected case of swine flu. (I say “suspected” because at least in my community, doctors are only giving the “swine flu” test to hospitalized patients, which, thankfully, I was not.) I am starting to feel better now. I have much to share with you. (One thing being sick is good for — lots of time to think.) Here goes.
Following is a list of my top five six blogging mistakes. I admit, I’ve made each of them, as I’ve learned “on the job” so the speak. I’m not judging here; just sharing what I’ve learned. I see these mistakes frequently on my jogs around the blogosphere. The list is important for journalist bloggers, but I think it makes sense for most other bloggers, too. If I’ve missed a mistake on your “top five” list, please share and post a comment.
Mystery blogger: I hate when I have to hunt around on a blog to find out who the blogger is. I don’t want to have to click on your Google profile or your FriendFeed link to find out who you are. Just tell me. Thanks. Every blog should have an “About Me” page to tell readers about the blogger. Even better: A place on the main page that explains who you are. (Regular readers will notice I’ve taken my own advice and added this to my blog.)
Fake names: I know it’s fun to come up with some neat pen name for your blogging career, but I’d suggest you use your real name. Why? It helps me believe you more. It enhances your credibility. And it enables me or other readers to verify who you are? Plus, I just lose a bit of respect for someone who feels comfortable sounding off on a subject without letting people know who he or she is. A real name also helps you brand yourself as your name, which will be increasingly important as journalism becomes more entrepreneurial. And, as Penelope Trunk at Brazen Careerist, points out: It’s easier to network online using your real name. (By the way, Penelope apparently also committed the “fake name” sin. Penelope isn’t her real name, and she explains why here.)
(Now, I know fake names are common in some blogging genres, such as moms who write about their kids. The nom de plume is meant to protect the children’s privacy, so the whole world won’t know “Oh, you’re the one who wasn’t potty trained until age 5.” That’s a bit of a different case in my mind than a journalistic blog, and I’m less troubled by fake names on truly personal blogs like these.)
But for just about everyone else, use your real name. And while you’re at it, use a real picture, too. I love those cartoon avatars as much as anyone, but a real picture is, well, really you.
No links: If you’re updating a post, please link to the background. If you’re writing about an issue covered elsewhere, link to stories or blog posts about that issue. If you use a technical or medical term I might not understand, link to a definition. If you mention an organization or agency, link to it, so I can easily find out more information. If you’re commenting on a buzz across the Twitterverse, link to the tweets. If other bloggers are writing about your topic, link to their posts.
When I read a blog post that ignores the Web’s ability to link, I just see it as a missed opportunity. Linking makes things easier for your readers, and it offers journalists many other benefits, including making their jobs easier, says Ryan Sholin, director of news innovation at Publish2, in a great list of why to link at Beat Blogging. Here’s my own philosophy on why journalists should link, including: It will encourage other blogs to link to your blog, which helps you index higher in Google.
There’s no there, there: If you love what I’ve written, and you copy my first graph, paste it on your blog and say, “Gina Chen has a great post” and then link to it, I’ll be eternally grateful because you’ve expanded my audience and you’ve added an inbound link that will help me index higher in Google. But I’d be even happier if you read what I wrote, thought about it, digested it, and then blogged about what you think of the issue and linked to my post for context. The best blogs, I think, add to the conversation, by adding value, by saying something. Disagree. Agree. Expand. Dispute. Debate. Compare.
There certainly is a place for aggregator blogs, which summarize posts and link to them. Jim Romenesko’s blog at Poynter Online aggregates thoughtful posts and news stories related to journalism, and it’s on my must-read list every day. But not every blog can do that as well and comprehensively as he does. Blogging is a conversation, so a blogger must say something to have someone else say something back. That’s what really makes it a dynamic medium.
No response to comments: You read a blog post and find it insightful, so you post a comment, adding to what the blogger said and expanding the idea. You come to the blog a few hours or even days later. Nothing. No response. Your comment hangs out there like a failed joke told at a party, but even worse because now there’s an online record of you virtually talking to yourself. I strongly believe bloggers should respond to comments on their blogs. Being a blogger is a bit like being a host: You need to keep the conversation flowing, engage the guests and make it clear to the flaming idiots that their ilk won’t be tolerated.
When you respond to comments, you’ll likely get more comments, create a more interesting site (sometimes the banter in the comments can be the best part of a blog) and forestall the development of ”comment ghettos,” where commenters just hurl barbs at each other. Plus, it’s one of the fun parts of blogging — to be able to “talk” to your readers in real time. Old Media New Tricks offers a comprehensive list of how to navigate responding to comments on your blog.
No contact form: The thing about blogs is, if you want to say something to the blogger, you can always post a comment (unless, of course, that feature is turned off, which it shouldn’t be.) But what if you want to say something a bit more general, that isn’t related to a post. Or you want to invite the blogger to do a guest blog or speak at a panel discussion. That’s why a “contact me” form is vital. It’s an easy way for readers to reach the blogger. Adding an e-mail address is also a good idea. You can get free e-mail address through Yahoo or Google, so there’s no excuse not to set one up just for your blog. That way you’re not giving the whole world your personal e-mail. You can always e-mail me at savethemedia@yahoo.com.
What’s your blogging pet peeve? Share it. Post a comment. (I promise I’ll answer you back.)
I'm Gina Chen, a 20-year veteran newspaper journalist who is studying for a communications Ph.D. I want to see journalism survive. I believe news organizations need to embrace new media, change their thinking, improve their content and innovate. Read more about me 

15 Comments
June 14th, 2009 at 1:08 pm
So far, I find mistakes you written on your posts that i am commiting at present.
1. No about me page
2. Fake Names
June 14th, 2009 at 2:56 pm
I originally committed both the mystery blogger/fake name sins on my blog, but I felt that I had a good reason. As a teacher, I sometimes write about things my students do. I never use their names, but if you know who I am, you might be able to guess who they are. I also didn’t want to be out in the open because I was concerned with my district’s take on teacher’s blogging at first. It was more than a year before I decided to put my real name on my blog.
I do agree that it is hard to be a part of the community if you are anonymous. So it is a trade off. I do think educators need to be somewhat circumspect when creating a blog. We are not just blogging about ourselves, but often our students too, even if only by describing our methods.
For members of the media, I totally agree with all of your points, but especially the transparency. The media must always keep itself open to the public or it loses any power it has.
But I didn’t fall into your other four mistakes. Yeah me! Great post, thanks for sharing.
June 14th, 2009 at 8:06 pm
@Teach_J (Robert Courtemanche) –
Hey, I committed all six of my mistakes at one point or another.
I can see your reasoning about using fake name, considering you’re writing about your students (even anonymously). That’s similar to what I was saying about the mom bloggers.
And it is a tricky issue about blogging about something related to work — and not being sure if your employer will like that. I went through that, too. (They didn’t fire me yet, so I guess I’m OK.)
Blogging opens up a whole new world of communication. Thanks for adding your voice.
– Gina
June 14th, 2009 at 8:07 pm
@agentmango –
Oh, come on. We just want to know who you really are, agent mango!
– Gina
June 15th, 2009 at 10:23 am
Gina,
You make some good points and I respect you for your dedication to the profession as well as your open-minded approach to the future of journalism. However, one thing that got to me was the mention of anonymity as a mistake. As you can see, I am a big believer in anonymity in blogging, if you have reasonable reasons for it. I agree perhaps one has to work harder to develop credibility because of it, but this is an intentional trade-off I am willing to accept. While my reasons for secrecy are due to the sensitive nature of both my career and the careers of those who share their thoughts with my readers, I have written of many other examples of why this is important and should be embraced by people in your profession. I would prefer to openly promote my blog and perhaps can do so in the future, but at present that just isn’t possible.
One other note is related to your example of Penelope Trunk. Great blogger, however not her real name… She’s even blogged about why she “changed” it.
Keep up the good work.
June 15th, 2009 at 2:10 pm
@MediaSlackers –
Like all rules, they are made to be broken if it makes sense. It sounds like anonymity works for you, so be it. (It does depend on your blog, what you hope to accomplish and, I think, the likelihood you’ll get fired if you use your real name.)
Didn’t know that about Penelope Trunk. Thought that was her real name. (Hangs head in shame.) Thanks for cluing me in.
– Gina
June 15th, 2009 at 3:13 pm
Penelope Trunk sounds a little too “Harry Potter” to me. It just screams nom de plum. But who am I to say, mine is just my profession abbreviated.
Robert
June 15th, 2009 at 5:05 pm
“The best blogs, I think, add to the conversation…” agree honey but sometimes we in a hurry & still want to pass it around!
June 16th, 2009 at 1:20 pm
@Joyce – True, true, true.
Always want to spread the good word quickly. Couldn’t agree more with that. But when there is time, it’s great do both — spread the word and expand on it.
– Gina
June 16th, 2009 at 4:43 pm
Hi Gina,
I think is important to show your real name on your blog, specially when it’s a journalist’s blog. The mistake in my blog is that I didn’t have an e-mail adress to people contact me, thanks to your advices the problem is solved. Since I found you on twitter, I am learning a lot of thinks. Keep writing interesting thinks for us. Thanks.
June 17th, 2009 at 6:55 pm
@Teach_J (Robert Courtemanche) –
Yes … now that I know Penelope Trunk isn’t her real name it does seem obvious. Silly me.
– Gina
June 17th, 2009 at 6:55 pm
@Edson de Andrade –
Glad to be of help and thanks for sharing your experience.
– Gina
June 18th, 2009 at 8:37 pm
[...] up an “About Me” page: This should include your name (real ones, please) where you’re from (town or community; we don’t need your street address), why [...]
June 22nd, 2009 at 9:01 am
Great post, Gina. I also just enjoy discovering new sites that link to me. One’s audience can come from anywhere — but it’s a blogger’s responsibility to cultivate it.
March 3rd, 2010 at 9:55 pm
[...] writes a great blog, Save the Media, where you can find useful tips. Here are two posts she did on blogging tips for journalists. Great content – check them [...]
Leave a Reply