Comments on: Can new media save the media? http://savethemedia.com/2009/01/27/can-new-media-save-the-media/ A veteran journalist blogs about the new media revolution. Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:09:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: bloggingmom67 http://savethemedia.com/2009/01/27/can-new-media-save-the-media/comment-page-1/#comment-259 bloggingmom67 Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:06:52 +0000 http://savethemedia.com/?p=451#comment-259 Michael, Great point. You express way better than I did what I'm trying to say. I think you make an apt distinction between neutrality and objectivity. Thanks for adding your voice. -- Gina<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('259','bloggingmom67'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('259','bloggingmom67','Michael,\n\nGreat point. You express way better than I did what I\'m trying to say. I think you make an apt distinction between neutrality and objectivity. Thanks for adding your voice.\n\n-- Gina'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Michael,

Great point. You express way better than I did what I’m trying to say. I think you make an apt distinction between neutrality and objectivity. Thanks for adding your voice.

– Gina

Reply – Quote
]]> By: Michael J http://savethemedia.com/2009/01/27/can-new-media-save-the-media/comment-page-1/#comment-258 Michael J Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:11:03 +0000 http://savethemedia.com/?p=451#comment-258 Re: Won’t connecting with readers damage my neutrality?”

Professional objectivity does not equal neutrality, IMHO. In fact it’s neutral corporate speak that makes the “news” so hard to understand and mostly boring.

Neutrality I can get from a Google search.

A considered professional “argument” in the sense they define at wikipedia is much preferable. The authentic voice of a really smart person who is a good writer , professionally objective and cares about making me see the story is best of all.

Reply – Quote
]]>